Reaction to Supreme Court of Canada Ruling and Mandated Re-Education

Jordan Peterson's Re-education Mandate

• Jordan Peterson, a clinical psychologist, has been under investigation by the College of Psychologists of Ontario since 2016.
• The investigation was initiated due to complaints filed against Peterson for his public comments on social media, government policies, trans issues, and his appearance on the Joe Rogan podcast.

The College of Psychologists of Ontario's Actions

• The College of Psychologists of Ontario has mandated Peterson to undergo re-education, which involves being trained by a designated expert on how to conduct himself as a public intellectual.
• The re-education is at Peterson's expense and the expert chosen by the College is a self-proclaimed social media expert.
• Peterson appealed the mandated re-education to the Supreme Court of Canada, but his appeal was rejected.
• The Supreme Court also ordered Peterson to pay court costs to the College of Psychologists of Ontario.

Peterson's Views and Criticisms

• The accusations against Peterson stem from his vocal opposition to what he considers the "butchery of children" through gender-affirming care, which he views as a crime against humanity.
• Peterson has also criticized Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, calling him an "incompetent narcissist."
• Peterson believes the Supreme Court of Canada has made a terrible decision, which he considers a blow to the Canadian public, especially professionals.
• Peterson claims that professionals are now mandated by law and their regulatory boards to lie to the public, specifically mentioning teachers, engineers, lawyers, physicians, and psychologists.
• Peterson argues that professionals are being forced to comply with what they believe are crimes against humanity, such as performing surgical transformations on minors without informed consent.

Concerns about Free Speech and the Canadian System

• Peterson expressed concern about the implications for free speech in Canada, stating that the ruling essentially renders the Charter of Rights and Freedoms irrelevant in the context of professional regulation.
• Peterson highlighted the potential impact on regulated professionals across Canada, suggesting they may face limitations on their freedom of speech.
• Peterson expresses concern about the potential for the Canadian government to pass Bill C63, which would allow citizens to report others for their social media posts, leading to similar re-education programs.
• Peterson draws a parallel to the situation in the UK, where individuals are facing legal consequences for their social media posts related to protests.
• Peterson emphasizes the importance of transparency and encourages people to make their own judgments about the situation, despite the pressure to trust either the speaker or the Supreme Court.

Peterson's Response and Future Plans

• Peterson discussed the Supreme Court of Canada's ruling on mandated re-education for professionals.
• Peterson expressed his intention to continue creating content and engaging with his audience despite the challenges posed by the Supreme Court ruling.
• Peterson also mentioned his ongoing projects, including the Peterson Academy, which aims to provide high-quality lectures at a low cost.

The Speaker's Perspective

• The speaker was ordered to undergo re-education by the College of Psychologists of Ontario for comments made on The Joe Rogan podcast.
• The speaker criticized the College's actions and stated that they are motivated by an ideological agenda.
• The speaker believes that the climate change narrative is increasingly shaky and that the "green scam" will eventually disappear.
• The speaker is not concerned about the potential consequences of the re-education process, including being arrested.
• The speaker is critical of the College's actions and believes that psychologists have a responsibility to oppose the "gender affirming ideological monstrous sterilizers and mutilators of children."
• The speaker plans to comply with the re-education process but is not enthusiastic about it.
• The speaker believes that the College's actions are an attempt to silence dissent and that they are motivated by a desire for power and control.
• The speaker expresses concern about the Canadian judicial system, regulatory system, legislative system, education system, and healthcare system, suggesting they have become corrupt and untrustworthy.
• The speaker believes the re-education course is a sham and that no one would agree to re-educate them.
• The speaker warns anyone considering participating in the re-education course that it will have a significant negative impact on their lives.
• The speaker is discussing a recent Supreme Court of Canada ruling that mandates re-education for individuals who have expressed views deemed harmful.
• The speaker believes the goal of the re-education is to force an apology, which they are unwilling to give.
• The speaker questions the qualifications of the "social media experts" who will be conducting the re-education, arguing that they lack expertise in psychology.

Personal Acknowledgements

• The speaker acknowledges someone named Dad.
• The speaker acknowledges someone named Kiddo.